[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Article on Datamation website: "How Microsoft Office Tops LibreOffice: 11 Features"


On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:56 -0400, Robert Ryley wrote:
> Tom,
>
> I'm quite familiar with all of these claims. But they don't address
> the fundamental *business* question of how to support an open source
> *project* more effectively, which is more than just development. Some
> comments to follow:
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > Hi :)
> > I guess it depends what you mean by "pay" and "free". A vast amount of people get sucked into the Free Software World and
> > then start helping people or programming or putting their valuable time into the projects in other ways that benefit the project.
> > The pay-off is that they tend to reduce their outgoings so there is less need for them to spend money on things they would >normally have to spend a lot of money on.
> >
>
> This is focused on *cost* as opposed to *profit* and is trapped into
> the commodity mindset. Costs are irrelevant if you have no sales. It
> is also why FOSS has trouble (with a few exceptions) selling itself
> outside of a few niches.
>
> > The Free Software Foundation are very clear in their GPLs and such how people can legitimately earn money through Free >Software. The ones i noticed were through providing technical support and selling the software on media such as Cds/Dvds
> >/Usb-sticks. For the devs i guess that means tier3 support?
>
> That model worked when having tangible media was a value added
> service. Is that model really relevant now when you can download
> fully functional software and install it automatically?
>
> Software is more than just the code. It is the documentation and
> education of users. Education of users is *the* most effective
> marketing I know of, because educated users then become marketers for
> you. There is less benefit to open sourcing these aspects than there
> is to just open sourcing the code.
>
> > A lot of devs are paid by the company they work for to work on FLOSS projects. The pay-off for the companies are things like >NOT paying a rival competitor vast sums of money for license fees. Also being able to target specific issues to suit the company >rather than waiting for a rival company to get around to it (whatever "it" happens to be that month). Helping produce >something that undercuts their rivals products is an off-shoot.
>
> The companies that support FLOSS are large companies that have profits
> from other areas, so their activities are in essence a subsidy. How
> would you justify pursuing FLOSS development strategy to a start-up,
> without the cash to burn? That is my concern.
>
> > Copenhagen hospitals are apparently set to save millions by moving to LibreOffice. If they spent a fraction of that saving on >developers time then they could end up with something practically purpose-built for their precise needs. A small boost to the >local economy rather than having that money disappear off to a foreign country.
>
> There are economic fallacies here, but I don't dispute that
> LibreOffice is a viable alternative to MS Office. I provide help
> (unpaid) to professional writers who need to use it to do things that
> MS Office does not, after all.
>
> I want developers to be able to earn a *very* good living from
> developing and supporting FLOSS as an alternative to working for some
> large organization that happens to permit contributions to some
> projects. I have seen no effort to encourage the development of ISV
> to make money via support of LO, or by offering value added
> extensions.

Hi,

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDFCertification

Thanks,

//drew


> That would go a long way toward spurring the use of LO,
> as well as providing an alternative funding source for the TDF. The
> TDF could act as a lead generator for ISV, who then pay for this
> service as a marketing expense for their business. They also help
> contribute to testing, etc.
>



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.