Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Jan,

Jan Iversen píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 16:27 +0100:

this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and
Documentation teams, but they should know :-)

It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use pootle (sl and sr) please do 
not forget those.

Thanks for the reminder.  I hope Cloph can do the upgrade for them some
way that fits them too, though?

It does also influence the help repo (of course), since the change will be a very big commit.

[Or - any objections to this change?]

No objections as I think it is a good and welcome change, just a question.

As we discussed in ESC (and Oliver sort of pushed) it seems the goal
is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml (if I understood it correct). If
decided do we then want to do that as a set of small steps or make 1
script that does it ?

I tried to explain on the documentation@ why a big-bang move to html is
not a good idea from many reasons in another thread; to name the most
important ones:

* big-bang "let's abandon one technology and hooray for another one"
  always brings lots of regressions that are hard to fix in a timely
  manner; incremental changes are easier to maintain

* html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and
  need) in the help files (like <section> or <embed> to name few)

* there are many ways how to describe the same thing in html (<b>'s and
  <i>'s vs. <strong> and <emph> vs. <div>'s with css vs. who-knows-what)
  which would make the help harder to maintain, if we eg. want to reuse
  the information from there to generate other representations (like
  eg. books or so)

Please just see this as a question of how often to we want to run these conversions.

One more may be needed if we agree that the id="..." attribute could be
done non-mandatory, because that one affects the msgctx too.

If we want to make the XHP markup look more like HTML markup (which I
don't object in general & this is up to agreement between between the
Documentation and L10n people), there might be additional conversions
needed, for things like <image> -> <img> etc. - but I'd like to keep
this separate from the cleanup effort / topic.

All the best,
Kendy


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.