Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Totally disagree from experience. Of course, both is better but you try working in a language with not even a spellchecker and then get someone to count the errors. Even mediocre spellcheck coverage kills a good % of typos. I just have to take a random Gaelic page off the BBC and dump it in LO and count the hits. 

Michael

Sgrìobh toki na leanas 03/05/2016 aig 19:35:
This goes back to my claim that spell checking without built-in grammar checking is useless. 


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.